2000 Redistribution of Western Australia - Final Report

Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Section 75

CONTENTS

PART 1

REDISTRIBUTION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA INTO FIFTEEN ELECTORAL

1.1

Determination made by the augmented Electoral Commission

1.2

Process followed by the augmented Electoral Commission

1.3

Reasons for the determination made by the augmented

1.4

Statistical summary

1.5

General description of each Electoral Division

Appendix A

Composition of the augmented Electoral Commission

Appendix B

List of Objections lodged with the Australian Electoral

Appendix C

List of Comments on Objections lodged with the Australian

Appendix D

List of persons who appeared at the public inquiry

Appendix E

Guidelines for the naming of Commonwealth Electoral

Appendix F

Redistribution timetable

Appendix G

Outline Maps of the boundaries proposed by the Redistribution

PART 2

REPORT OF THE REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE - PROPOSED

2.1

Reasons for the proposed redistribution

2.2

Statistical Summary

2.3

General description of the manner in which

PART 3

ENCLOSURES


Copies of Suggestions to the Redistribution Committee

Comments on Suggestions

Objections to the proposed redistribution

Comments on Objections

Transcript of proceedings at public inquiry into Objections held on 7 August 2000


Composite maps (2) showing the boundaries of the electoral divisions for Western Australia as determined by the augmented Electoral Commission available by contacting the AEC on 02 6271 4419.

1.1  DETERMINATION MADE BY THE AUGMENTED ELECTORAL

Pursuant to section 73 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Act), the augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia hereby determines that the boundaries and names of the Electoral Divisions into which the State of Western Australia is to be distributed are as shown on the maps certified by the members of the augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia and lodged in File Number 2000/0984 at the Principal Office of the Australian Electoral Commission in Canberra.  These maps are numbered in the following sequence:

WA1/2000            Brand

WA2/2000            Canning

WA3/2000            Cowan

WA4/2000            Curtin

WA5/2000            Forrest

WA6/2000            Fremantle

WA7/2000            Hasluck

WA8/2000            Kalgoorlie

WA9/2000            Moore

WA10/2000          O'Connor

WA11/2000          Pearce

WA12/2000          Perth

WA13/2000          Stirling

WA14/2000          Swan

WA15/2000          Tangney

The determination of the augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia is that the boundaries and names of the Electoral Divisions in Western Australia are as proposed by the Redistribution Committee for Western Australia, except for the changes described later in this Report.

T R Morling
Chairman
Augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia

20 November 2000


1.2 PROCESS FOLLOWED BY THE AUGMENTED ELECTORAL COMMISSION N

  1. Notice of the Redistribution Committee's proposal was published in the Commonwealth Gazette on 26 May 2000.  Outline maps of the proposed redistribution by the Redistribution Committee for Western Australia and a notice inviting Objections and Comments on Objections against the proposal were published in "The West Australian" and "The Australian" newspapers on 26 May 2000. In addition, the section 68 report was made available for public inspection at all offices of the AEC in Western Australia. Furthermore, the section 68 report, outline maps and suggestions and comments on suggestions were posted to the AEC website, www.aec.gov.au on 26 May 2000
  2. By the deadline of 6pm on Friday 23 June 2000, Objections against the Redistribution Committee's proposal were received from:

    Mr Robert L Eagle

    Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc

    Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch

    Mr Bill Stewart

  3. These Objections were made available for public inspection from 9.00am on 26 June 2000, and are included on the compact disc accompanying this Report.
  4. By the deadline of 6.00pm on 7 July 2000, Comments on the Objections were received from:

    Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc

    Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch

  5. These Comments on Objections were made available for public inspection from 9.00am on 10 July 2000, and are included on the compact disc accompanying this Report.
  6. In accordance with section 72(3) of the Act, the augmented Electoral Commission held a public inquiry into Objections on 7 August 2000.  The inquiry was advertised in "The West Australian" and "The Weekend Australian" newspapers on 22 July 2000.  A transcript of the inquiry is included on the compact disc accompanying this Report.  Those appearing at the inquiry were:

    Mr Aaron Barrett, representing the Federal Member for Kalgoorlie

    Mr Jeremy Buxton, representing the Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc

    Mr John Halden, representing the Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch

  7. The augmented Electoral Commission during its deliberations considered all Objections, Comments on Objections and supporting documentation tabled at the inquiry.
  8. In accordance with section 72(10)(b) of the Act, the augmented Electoral Commission issued a public announcement on 14 August 2000 that it had concluded its deliberations on the new boundaries and names of the 15 Divisions for Western Australia.
  9. This report of the augmented Electoral Commission's determination is published in accordance with sections 73 and 74 of the Act.

1.3 REASONS FOR THE DETERMINATION MADE BY THE AUGMENTED

Consideration of Objections to the Redistribution Committee proposal

Objection of Mr Robert Eagle

  1. This objection proposed substantial changes to the boundaries of the Divisions of Canning, Forrest, Kalgoorlie and O'Connor suggesting that the revised boundaries reflect greater adherence to the criteria for determining boundaries.  However, the augmented Electoral Commission determined that the community of interest, communication and travel criteria were better served by the Redistribution Committee's proposal. Further, the objection did not address the potentially substantial changes that would result in the Perth metropolitan area.

Objections of the Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc

  1. The first objection of the Liberal Party was to the proposed boundary between the Divisions of Hasluck and Pearce.  It suggests reverting to the existing boundary which runs east along Marshall Road, West Swan Road, Middle Swan Road and southward along the railway line with the result that the localities of Caversham, Guildford, Midland, Viveash, Middle Swan (part), Midvale, Bellevue and Hazelmere move from the Division of Pearce to Hasluck.  Further, it suggests that the localities of Jane Brook, Stratton, Swan View, Geenmount and Boya be located in the Division of Pearce.  The augmented Electoral Commission agreed with the Liberal Party's contention that the community of interest, communication and travel criteria would be better served by this change to the Redistribution Committee's proposal.  In addition, fewer electors would be transferred from existing divisions.  The Australian Labor Party, in its comments on the objection, also agreed with the content of the Liberal Party's objection.
  2. The second objection of the Liberal Party was to the proposed boundary between the Divisions of Forrest and O'Connor.  It suggested that the Shire of Collie be retained in the Division of O'Connor, and that the Shires of Boyup Brook and Denmark be retained in the Division of Forrest.  However, the augmented Electoral Commission determined that the Redistribution Committee's proposal was appropriate in terms of community of interest criteria.

Objections of the Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch

  1. The first objection of the Australian Labor Party was to the proposed boundaries between the Divisions of Canning, Hasluck and Tangney.  It suggested that the part of the locality of Huntingdale proposed for inclusion in the Division of Hasluck be reunited within the Division of Canning; that the part of the City of Canning, being part of the locality of Canning Vale, in the Division of Canning be retained in the Division of Tangney; and that the part of the City of Gosnells, being the locality of Langford, in the Division of Tangney be transferred to the Division of Hasluck.  However, the augmented Electoral Commission did not agree with the contention that stronger boundaries and community of interest would result.  While it acknowledged that the locality of Huntingdale would be split between two divisions, the augmented Electoral Commission determined that the retention of the locality of Canning Vale within one Division equally serves the community of interest criteria.  The other two arms to the objection cannot stand alone, as enrolment tolerances would be exceeded as a result.
  2. The second objection of the Australian Labor Party was to the proposed boundary between the Divisions of Kalgoorlie and O'Connor.  It suggested that the Shires of Chapman Valley, Mullewa and Northampton be transferred to the Division of O'Connor on the basis of community of interest with the Shire of Geraldton.  However, the augmented Electoral Commission noted that there is a long history of these Shires being included in the Division of Kalgoorlie, and determined that the rationale of the Redistribution Committee, that there is no need to make any change to the boundaries of the Division of Kalgoorlie on this occasion, was satisfactory.

Objection of Mr Bill Stewart

  1. This objection proposed that the locality of Waterman be transferred back to the Division of Stirling from the Division of Moore.  The augmented Electoral Commission noted that the locality of Waterman was included in the Division of Moore to satisfy elector number tolerances, and therefore determined that the objection should not be upheld.

Further Change to the Redistribution Committee proposal

  1. Whilst no formal objection was lodged, the augmented Electoral Commission determined that community of interest would be enhanced by a small change to the Redistribution Committee's proposed boundary between the Divisions of Cowan and Perth, by transferring that part of the locality of Beechboro in the Division of Cowan to the Division of Perth. 

Correction to the Section 68 Report of the Redistribution Committee

  1. The geographic area for the Divisions of Canning, Hasluck and Pearce as shown in Table 3 of the section 68 report of the Redistribution Committee, released on 26 May 2000, was incorrect.  Table 3 of this Report correctly reflects the area of these Divisions as proposed by the Redistribution Committee.
  2. In the section 68 report of the Redistribution Committee, the tables showing how the proposed Divisions of Cowan and Moore were constituted contained a minor error.  The table for Cowan shows Joondalup (C) as being transferred to the Division of Moore, and the table for Moore shows Joondalup (C) as being received from the Division of Cowan.  Joondalup (C) in each case should have been Wanneroo (C).  There were no electors involved in either case.  The tables for the Divisions of Cowan and Moore, respectively of this Report correctly reflect the transfer of Wanneroo (C).

Displacement of electors

  1. Under the augmented Electoral Commission's determination, the number of electors that will be transferred to a different Division is 188,891 or 15.95% of the electors of the State at 23 December 1999, the quota date.

Significance of changes to the Redistribution Committee proposal

  1. The augmented Electoral Commission determined that the changes to the Redistribution Committee's proposal were not significant.  Consequently, in accordance with section 72(13) of the Act, the augmented Electoral Commission's proposal is not open to further objection and the 2000 Redistribution of Western Australia into 15 Electoral Divisions is now concluded.

Acknowledgements

  1. The augmented Electoral Commission would like to thank all those who participated in the redistribution process, and to acknowledge the administrative support provided by Mr Pat Smyth and Ms Kaye Bartlett of the Australian Electoral Commission.

T R Morling

A K Becker

D J Trewin

A D Moyes

H J Houghton

D D R Pearson

Chairman

Member

Member

Member

Member

Member

AUGMENTED ELECTORAL COMMISSION FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA

20 November 2000

1.4    STATISTICAL SUMMARY

TABLE 1 - STATISTICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REDISTRIBUTION
Number of Divisions in WA 14
Number of Electors enrolled in WA as at 23/12/1999 1,184,058
Quota for WA  78,937
Permissible maximum number of electors (+10%) in a Division  86,830
Permissible minimum number of electors ( -10%) in a Division 71,044
TABLE 2 - ENROLMENT PROJECTIONS FOR 31 MARCH 2004
Number of Divisions into which WA is to be distributed 15
Projected number of electors in WA as at 31/03/2004 1,311,002
Average enrolment for WA projected at 31/03/2004 87,400
103.5% of average enrolment projected at 31/03/2004 90,459
96.5% of average enrolment projected at 31/03/2004 84,341
TABLE 3 - STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF DIVISIONS
No. Division Actual Var%  (A) Projected Var% (P) Area (sq km)
1 Brand 74,528 -5.59 88,665 1.45 429.51
2 Canning 72,045 -8.73 86,896 -0.58 4,174.42
3 Cowan 77,235 -2.16 88,638 1.42 195.28
4 Curtin 83,424 5.68 85,898 -1.72 89.48
5 Forrest 79,009 0.09 90,070 3.05 21,142.62
6 Fremantle 78,079 -1.09 86,479 -1.05 199.33
7 Hasluck 78,596 -0.43 86,772 -0.72 226.99
8 Kalgoorlie 82,701 4.77 89,775 2.72 2,295,354.21
9 Moore 72,538 -8.11 84,988 -2.76 78.49
10 O'Connor 82,894 5.01 86,790 -0.7 179,047.29
11 Pearce 73,868 -6.42 87,148 -0.29 26,251.14
12 Perth 81,391 3.11 87,859 0.53 73.59
13 Stirling 86,076 9.04 88,758 1.55 76.33
14 Swan 78,145 -1 84,956 -2.8 108.55
15 Tangney 83,529 5.82 87,310 -0.1 69.97
  Average 78,937 0 87,400 0 168,501.15
  WA 1,184,058 0 1,311,002 0 2,527,517.2
TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF MOVEMENT OFELECTORS BETWEEN DIVISIONS
Number of Electors remaining in their existing Division 995,167 84.05%
Number of Electors transferred to another Division 188,891 15.95%
TOTAL 1,184,058  

1.5 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EACH ELECTORAL DIVISION

  1. The tables in the following pages set out how each Division is constituted and are arranged under Statistical Local Areas (SLAs). Each SLA comprises a number of Census Collector Districts (CCDs) that applied at the 1996 Population Census.
  2. The SLA is the most widely used unit in the presentation of Census data and collectively covers the whole of Western Australia without gaps or overlaps. SLAs correspond, in the majority of cases, to Local Government Areas (LGAs). Where a particular LGA is substantially different from the general run of LGAs in terms of size and economic significance, the LGAs can be split into a number of SLAs. For reasons of availability of data, the SLAs used for this redistribution are those in place at the 1996 Census.

Division of Brand

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Brand    
     Kwinana (T) 12594 15931
     Mandurah (C) 18946 20923
     Rockingham (C) 42988 51811
Total from existing Division of Brand 74528 88665
SLAs received 0 0
Total SLAs received 0 0
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF BRAND 74528 88665
SLAs transferred to Division of Canning    
     Mandurah (C) 6820 8549
Total SLAs transferred 6820 8549

Division of Canning

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Canning    
     Armadale (C) 28598 30915
     Gosnells (C) 2487 3866
     Mandurah (C) 4439 5510
     Murray (S) 7020 7993
     Serpentine-Jarrahdale (S) 6921 9010
Total from existing Division of Canning 49465 57294
SLAs received from Division of Brand    
     Mandurah (C) 6820 8549
     
SLAs received from Division of O'Connor    
     Waroona (S) 2174 2354
     
SLAs received from Division of Pearce    
     Armadale (C) 4189 4537
     
SLAs received from Division of Tangney    
     Canning (C) 3692 5152
     Gosnells (C) 5705 9010
Total SLAs received 22580 29602
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF CANNING 72045 86896
SLAs transferred to Division of Hasluck    
     Gosnells (C) 32723 35598
Total SLAs transferred 32723 35598

Division of Cowan

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Cowan    
     Bayswater (C) 5008 5151
     Stirling (C) 221 213
     Swan (C) 12694 15199
     Wanneroo (C) 30536 35729
     Joondalup (C) 26697 28686
Total from existing Division of Cowan 75156 84978
SLAs received from existing Division of Moore    
     Wanneroo (C) 2079 3660
Total SLAs received 2079 3660
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF COWAN 77235 88638
SLAs transferred to Division of Moore    
     Wanneroo (C) 0 0
     
SLAs transferred to Division of Perth    
     Bayswater (C) 4455 4493
     Swan (C) 301 526
Total SLAs transferred 4756 5019

Division of Curtin

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Curtin    
     Cambridge (T) 16518 16801
     Claremont (T) 6248 6422
     Cottesloe (T) 5317 5443
     Mosman Park (T) 5317 5622
     Nedlands (C) 14164 14770
     Peppermint Grove (S) 1047 1050
     Perth (C) 1253 1441
     Stirling (C) 15343 15883
     Subiaco (C) 9735 10160
     Vincent (T) 8482 8306
Total from existing Division of Curtin 83424 85898
SLAs received 0 0
Total SLAs received 0 0
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF CURTIN 83424 85898
SLAs transferred to Division of Stirling    
     Stirling (C) 3590 3763
Total SLAs transferred 3590 3763

Division of Forrest

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Forrest    
     Augusta-Margaret River (S) 5834 7224
     Bridgetown-Greenbushes (S) 2663 2900
     Bunbury (C) 19648 21083
     Busselton (S) 14079 17114
     Capel (S) 4382 5053
     Dardanup (S) 5172 6357
     Donnybrook-Balingup (S) 2957 3258
     Manjimup (S) 6613 7115
     Nannup (S) 862 908
Total from existing Division of Forrest 62210 71012
SLAs received from Division of O'Connor    
     Collie (S) 5916 5976
     Harvey (S) 10883 13082
Total SLAs received 16799 19058
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF FORREST 79009 90070
SLAs transferred to Division of O'Connor    
     Albany (C) 19987 21982
     Boyup Brook (S) 1148 1114
     Denmark (S) 2884 3465
Total SLAs transferred 24019 26561

Division of Fremantle

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Fremantle    
     Cockburn (C) 40083 46281
     East Fremantle (T) 4630 4735
     Fremantle (C) 17484 18289
     Melville (C) 15882 17174
Total from existing Division of Fremantle 78079 86479
SLAs received 0 0
Total SLAs received 0 0
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF FREMANTLE 78079 86479
SLAs transferred to Division of Tangney    
     Melville (C) 8789 9246
Total SLAs transferred 8789 9246

Division of Hasluck

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs received from existing Division of Canning    
     Gosnells (C) 32723 35598
     
SLAs received from existing Division of Pearce    
     Canning (C) 0 0
     Kalamunda (S) 24632 25823
     Mundaring (S) 1705 2119
     Swan (C) 870 1002
     
SLAs received from existing Division of Perth    
     Mundaring (S) 987 1079
     Swan (C) 7977 9835
     
SLAs received from existing Division of Swan    
     Canning (C) 0 0
     Gosnells (C) 0 0
     Kalamunda (S) 5763 6595
     Swan (C) 1654 2268
     
SLAs received from existing Division of Tangney    
     Gosnells (C) 2285 2453
Total SLAs received 78596 86772
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF HASLUCK 78596 86772

Division of Kalgoorlie

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Kalgoorlie    
     Ashburton (S) 3276 2776
     Broome (S) 6092 7612
     Carnarvon (S) 3761 3892
     Chapman Valley (S) 593 593
     Coolgardie (S) 2478 2023
     Cue (S) 207 207
     Derby-West Kimberley (S) 3675 4740
     Dundas (S) 794 687
     East Pilbara (S) 3479 3226
     Esperance (S) 8338 9192
     Exmouth (S) 1225 1273
     Halls Creek (S) 1555 1916
     Kalgoorlie/Boulder (C) 17484 19474
     Laverton (S) 508 447
     Leonora (S) 905 1092
     Meekatharra (S) 693 723
     Menzies (S) 199 198
     Merredin (S) 2356 2394
     Mount Magnet (S) 447 448
     Mullewa (S) 595 579
     Murchison (S) 118 118
     Ngaanyatjarraku (S) 1067 1174
     Northampton (S) 2181 2367
     Port Hedland (T) 5990 6445
     Roebourne (S) 8127 8561
     Sandstone (S) 77 77
     Shark Bay (S) 579 578
     Upper Gascoyne (S) 246 246
     Westonia (S) 201 201
     Wiluna (S) 313 409
     Wyndham-East Kimberley (S) 3804 4741
     Yalgoo (S) 142 142
     Yilgarn (S) 1196 1224
Total from existing Division of Kalgoorlie 82701 89775
SLAs received 0 0
SLAs transferred 0 0
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF KALGOORLIE 82701 89775

Division of Moore

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Moore    
     Joondalup (C) 66732 78685
Total from existing Division of Moore 66732 78685
SLAs received from Division of Cowan    
     Wanneroo (C) 0 0
     
SLAs received from Division of Stirling    
     Stirling (C) 959 1024
     Joondalup (C) 4847 5279
Total SLAs received 5806 6303
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF MOORE 72538 84988
SLAs transferred to Division of Cowan    
     Wanneroo (C) 2079 3660
     
SLAs transferred to Division of Pearce    
     Wanneroo (C) 13248 18632
Total SLAs transferred 15327 22292

Division of O'Connor

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of O'Connor    
     Broomehill (S) 356 355
     Bruce Rock (S) 813 763
     Carnamah (S) 543 459
     Coorow (S) 873 876
     Corrigin (S) 961 931
     Cranbrook (S) 764 738
     Cunderdin (S) 894 846
     Dalwallinu (S) 1069 1090
     Dandaragan (S) 1850 2125
     Dowerin (S) 584 585
     Dumbleyung (S) 573 572
     Geraldton (C) 12590 12446
     Gnowangerup (S) 1118 1052
     Goomalling (S) 698 668
     Greenough (S) 7583 8798
     Irwin (S) 1891 2332
     Jerramungup (S) 841 834
     Katanning (S) 2824 2605
     Kellerberrin (S) 861 835
     Kent (S) 503 503
     Kojonup (S) 1555 1476
     Kondinin (S) 726 710
     Koorda (S) 394 394
     Kulin (S) 699 698
     Lake Grace (S) 1143 1201
     Mingenew (S) 381 381
     Moora (S) 1609 1545
     Morawa (S) 590 608
     Mount Marshall (S) 470 469
     Mukinbudin (S) 482 482
     Narembeen (S) 680 692
     Nungarin (S) 175 174
     Perenjori (S) 426 425
     Plantagenet (S) 2989 3197
     Quairading (S) 809 840
     Ravensthorpe (S) 962 1012
     Tambellup (S) 472 474
     Tammin (S) 257 260
     Three Springs (S) 526 526
     Trayning (S) 325 324
     Victoria Plains (S) 685 686
     Wagin (S) 1286 1282
     West Arthur (S) 728 680
     Wickepin (S) 549 548
     Wongan-Ballidu (S) 1044 1008
     Woodanilling (S) 232 232
     Wyalkatchem (S) 492 492
Total from existing Division of O'Connor 58875 60229
SLAs received from Division of Forrest    
     Albany (C) 19987 21982
     Boyup Brook (S) 1148 1114
     Denmark (S) 2884 3465
Total SLAs received 24019 26561
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF O'CONNOR 82894 86790
SLAs transferred to Division of Canning    
     Waroona (S) 2174 2354
     
SLAs transferred to Division of Forrest    
     Collie (S) 5916 5976
     Harvey (S) 10883 13082
     
SLAs transferred to Division of Pearce    
     Boddington (S) 895 897
     Brookton (S) 698 697
     Cuballing (S) 528 527
     Narrogin (S) 493 493
     Narrogin (T) 2860 2860
     Pingelly (S) 820 844
     Wandering (S) 248 248
     Williams (S) 670 658
Total SLAs transferred 26185 28636

Division of Pearce

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Pearce    
     Beverley (S) 1159 1188
     Chittering (S) 1735 2046
     Gingin (S) 2598 2873
     Kalamunda (S) 1716 1842
     Mundaring (S) 20397 22600
     Northam (S) 2198 2385
     Northam (T) 4157 4110
     Swan (C) 15006 19295
     Toodyay (S) 2395 2746
     York (S) 2047 2207
Total from existing Division of Pearce 53408 61292
SLAs received from existing Division of Moore    
     Wanneroo (C) 13248 18632
     
SLAs received from existing Division of O'Connor    
     Boddington (S) 895 897
     Brookton (S) 698 697
     Cuballing (S) 528 527
     Narrogin (S) 493 493
     Narrogin (T) 2860 2860
     Pingelly (S) 820 844
     Wandering (S) 248 248
     Williams (S) 670 658
Total SLAs received 20460 25856
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF PEARCE 73868 87148
SLAs transferred to Division of Canning    
     Armadale (C) 4189 4537
     
SLAs transferred to Division of Hasluck    
     Canning (C) 0 0
     Kalamunda (S) 24632 25823
     Mundaring (S) 1705 2119
     Swan (C) 870 1002
Total SLAs transferred 31396 33481

Division of Perth

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Perth    
     Bassendean (T) 9435 9657
     Bayswater (C) 22207 23094
     Perth (C) 1985 2845
     Stirling (C) 24252 25831
     Swan (C) 9443 12010
     Vincent (T) 9313 9403
Total from existing Division of Perth 76635 82840
SLAs received from Division of Cowan    
     Bayswater (C) 4455 4493
     Swan (C) 301 526
Total SLAs received 4756 5019
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF PERTH 81391 87859
SLAs transferred to Division of Hasluck    
     Mundaring (S) 987 1079
     Swan (C) 7977 9835
     
SLAs transferred to Division of Stirling    
     Stirling (C) 1417 1383
Total SLAs transferred 10381 12297

Division of Stirling

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Stirling    
     Stirling (C) 81069 83612
Total from existing Division of Stirling 81069 83612
SLAs received from Division of Curtin    
     Stirling (C) 3590 3763
     
SLAs received from Division of Perth    
     Stirling (C) 1417 1383
Total SLAs received 5007 5146
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF STIRLING 86076 88758
SLAs transferred to Division of Moore    
     Stirling (C) 959 1024
     Joondalup (C) 4847 5279
Total SLAs transferred 5806 6303

Division of Swan

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Swan    
     Belmont (C) 19591 21136
     Canning (C) 13396 15480
     Gosnells (C) 4005 4255
     Kalamunda (S) 1 1
     South Perth (C) 23979 25553
     Victoria Park (T) 17173 18531
Total from existing Division of Swan 78145 84956
SLAs received 0 0
Total SLAs received 0 0
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF SWAN 78145 84956
SLAs transferred to Division of Hasluck    
     Canning (C) 0 0
     Gosnells (C) 0 0
     Kalamunda (S) 5763 6595
     Swan (C) 1654 2268
Total SLAs transferred 7417 8863

Division of Tangney

How Constituted Actual
Enrolment
23 December 1999
Projected
Enrolment
31 March 2004
SLAs from existing Division of Tangney    
     Canning (C) 30883 31542
     Cockburn (C) 1471 1570
     Gosnells (C) 2971 3276
     Melville (C) 39415 41676
Total from existing Division of Tangney 74740 78064
SLAs received from Division of Fremantle    
     Melville (C) 8789 9246
Total SLAs received 8789 9246
TOTAL FOR DIVISION OF TANGNEY 83529 87310
SLAs transferred to Division of Canning    
     Canning (C) 3692 5152
     Gosnells (C) 5705 9010
     
SLAs transferred to Division of Hasluck    
     Gosnells (C) 2285 2453
Total SLAs transferred 11682 16615

APPENDIX A

COMPOSITION OF THE AUGMENTED ELECTORAL COMMISSION FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA
AND THE REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Members of the augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia

Hon Trevor Morling QC Chairman of the Australian Electoral Commission
Andy Becker Electoral Commissioner
Dennis Trewin Australian Statistician
Andrew Moyes Australian Electoral Officer for Western Australia
Des Pearson Auditor-General for Western Australia
Henry Houghton Surveyor-General for Western Australia
Members of the Redistribution Committee for Western Australia:
Andy Becker Electoral Commissioner
Andrew Moyes Australian Electoral Officer for Western Australia
Des Pearson Auditor-General for Western Australia
Henry Houghton Surveyor-General for Western Australia

APPENDIX B

LIST OF OBJECTIONS LODGED WITH THE AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 69(1) OF THE COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL ACT 1918

Mr Robert L Eagle

Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc

Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch

Mr Bill Stewart

APPENDIX C

LIST OF COMMENTS ON OBJECTIONS LODGED WITH THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 69(3) OF THE COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL ACT 1918

Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc

Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch

APPENDIX D

LIST OF PERSONS WHO APPEARED AT THE PUBLIC INQUIRY INTO OBJECTIONS
HELD BY THE AUGMENTED ELECTORAL COMMISSION FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA, PERTH 7 AUGUST 2000

Mr Aaron Barrett, representing the Federal Member for Kalgoorlie

Mr Jeremy Buxton, representing the Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc

Mr John Halden, representing the Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch

APPENDIX E

GUIDELINES FOR THE NAMING OF COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL DIVISIONS

Several Commonwealth Parliamentary committees have considered guidelines for naming Electoral Divisions. The guidelines below were affirmed by the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters in 1995.  The Redistribution Committee for Western Australia and the augmented Electoral Commission for Western Australia took these guidelines into account when considering the names of Electoral Divisions.  It should be noted that neither the Committee nor the augmented Commission are in any way bound by them.

Naming after persons

In the main, Divisions should be named after deceased Australians who have rendered outstanding service to their country.

When new Divisions are created the names of former Prime Ministers should be considered.

Federation Divisional names

Every effort should be made to retain the names of original Federation Divisions.

Geographical names

Locality or place names should generally be avoided, but in certain areas the use of geographical features may be appropriate (eg Perth, Kalgoorlie).

Aboriginal names

Aboriginal names should be used where appropriate and as far as possible existing Aboriginal Divisional names should be retained.

Other criteria

  • The names of Commonwealth Divisions should not duplicate existing State Districts.
  • Qualifying names may be used where appropriate (eg Melbourne Ports, Port Adelaide).
  • Names of Divisions should not be changed or transferred to new areas without very strong reasons.
  • When two or more Divisions are partially combined, as far as possible the name of the new Division should be that of the old Division which had the greatest number of electors within the new boundaries.  However, where the socio-demographic nature of the Division in question has changed significantly, this should override the numerical formula.

APPENDIX F

REDISTRIBUTION TIMETABLE

23 December 1999 Direction for State to be redistributed
Quota of electors determined
23 February 2000 Redistribution Committee appointed
23 February 2000 Suggestions and Comments on Suggestions invited
24 March 2000 Suggestions closed
7 April 2000 Comments on Suggestions closed
26 May 2000 Redistribution Committee proposal published
23 June 2000 Objections closed
7 July 2000 Comments on Objections closed
7 August 2000 Public hearing of Objections to the Redistribution Committee proposal
14 August 2000 Public announcement of augmented Electoral Commission's proposal
20 November 2000 Determination of names and boundaries

APPENDIX G    

OUTLINE MAP OF THE BOUNDARIES PROPOSED BY THE REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE

Proposed Division of Kalgoorlie Map

REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA

One of four maps showing proposed boundaries for Western Australia published on 26 May 2000

APPENDIX G    

OUTLINE MAP OF THE BOUNDARIES PROPOSED BY THE REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE

Canning, Forrest, O'connor, Pearce Divsion Map

REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA

One of four maps showing proposed boundaries for Western Australia published on 26 May 2000

APPENDIX G    

OUTLINE MAP OF THE BOUNDARIES PROPOSED BY THE REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE


Brand, Fremantle, Tangney Division Map

REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA

One of four maps showing proposed boundaries for Western Australia published on 26 May 2000

APPENDIX G    

OUTLINE MAP OF THE BOUNDARIES PROPOSED BY THE REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE


Proposed Divsional Map

REDISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE FOR WESTERN AUSTRALIA

One of four maps showing proposed boundaries for Western Australia as published on 26 May 2000



PART 2

2.1    REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED REDISTRIBUTION OF THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Direction for a redistribution of Western Australian Electoral Divisions

  1. Section 59(1) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Act) provides that a redistribution of a State into Divisions shall commence whenever the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) so directs by notice published in the Gazette.  This direction was published in the Gazette dated 23 December 1999.
  2. A direction is required to be made where the Australian Electoral Commissioner determines that, as a result of changes in population, the Parliamentary representation entitlement of a State or Territory has changed.  In accordance with Section 48 of the Act, the Electoral Commissioner must, during the thirteenth month after the first sitting of each House of Representatives, determine the entitlement of representation in each State and Territory.  On 9 December 1999 the Electoral Commissioner determined that Western Australia was entitled to fifteen members in the House of Representatives.

Appointment of the Redistribution Committee for Western Australia

  1. In accordance with Section 60 of the Act, the AEC appointed the Redistribution Committee for Western Australia on 23 February 2000
  2. The Redistribution Committee consists of the following members:
Electoral Commissioner Mr Andy Becker
Australian Electoral Officer for Western Australia Mr Andrew Moyes
Surveyor-General for Western Australia Mr Henry Houghton
Auditor-General for Western Australia Mr Des Pearson
  1. The Committee held its first meeting on 17 April 2000.

Invitation to submit Suggestions and Comments

  1. In accordance with Section 64 of the Act the Electoral Commissioner invited written Suggestions and written Comments on those Suggestions by notice published in the Gazette, and The West Australian and The Australian newspapers of 23 February 2000.
  2. At the closing date on 24 March 2000 Suggestions had been received from:

    Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc, Stirling Division [PDF] 114KB

    Senator Alan Eggleston [PDF] 111KB

    Ronald Keith Johnson [PDF] 70KB

    Shire of Collie [PDF] 471KB

    John Daniel Encel [PDF] 207KB

    David L Smith [PDF] 316KB

    John L Brown [PDF] 28KB

    K T Hebbard [PDF] 700KB

    Ian Stringall [PDF] 286KB

    Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch [PDF] 439KB

    Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc [PDF] 1045KB

  3. The period during which Comments could be made on these Suggestions closed on 7 April 2000 and at that date Comments were received from:

    Lisa Bridgeman [PDF] 51KB

    Kathleen I Haines [PDF] 169KB

    Senator Alan Eggleston [PDF] 100KB

    Robyn McSweeney [PDF] 264KB

    Liberal Party of Australia (WA Division) Inc [PDF] 334KB

    Australian Labor Party, Western Australian Branch [PDF] 643KB

Statutory requirements for the making of a proposed redistribution

  1. Section 66(1) of the Act requires the Redistribution Committee for Western Australia to make a proposed redistribution of the State.
  2. Sections 66(3) and 66(3A) of the Act prescribe that:

    (3)In making the proposed redistribution, the Redistribution Committee:

    (a) shall, as far as practicable, endeavour to ensure that, if the State or Territory were redistributed in accordance with the proposed redistribution, the number of electors enrolled in each Electoral Division in the State or Territory would not, at the projection time determined under Section 63A, be less than 96.5% or more than 103.5% of the average divisional enrolment of that State or Territory at that time; and

    (b) subject to paragraph (a), shall give due consideration, in relation to each proposed Electoral Division, to:

    (i) community of interests within the proposed Electoral Division, including economic, social and regional interests;

    (ii) means of communication and travel within the proposed Electoral Division;

    (iv) the physical features and area of the proposed Electoral Division; and

    (v) the boundaries of existing Divisions in the State or Territory;

    and subject thereto the quota of electors for the State or Territory shall be the basis for the proposed redistribution, and the Redistribution Committee may adopt a margin of allowance, to be used whenever necessary, but in no case shall the quota be departed from to a greater extent than one-tenth more or one-tenth less.

    (3A) When applying subsection (3), the Redistribution Committee must treat the matter in subparagraph (3)(b)(v) as subordinate to the matters in subparagraphs (3)(b)(i), (ii) and (iv).

Impact of the 1998 amendments to the Commonwealth Electoral Act

  1. The 1998 amendments to the Act had the following effects on the making of a redistribution:
  • Introducing provision for the AEC to alter the projection time in which to achieve equality of enrolment when a further redistribution is expected before the usual period of seven years has elapsed.
  • Bringing the time for striking the quota to the commencement of the redistribution process.
  • Widening the tolerance to be applied in achieving equality of electors at the projection time.
  • Requiring that consideration of the boundaries of existing Divisions be subordinate to the other criteria to be applied in the redistribution.

Quota

  1. At the end of 23 December 1999, the day of direction by the AEC that the redistribution must commence, the number of electors enrolled for the State was 1,184,058 (Table 1).
  2. Under Section 65(2) of the Act, the Electoral Commissioner determined that the quota of electors for Western Australia was 78,937 (1,184,058 divided by 15 Members). Thus, the permitted range of the margin of allowance of 10% below and above the quota would be 71,044 to 86,830 respectively. In making its proposals for the State, the Redistribution Committee is not permitted to exceed that range.

Enrolment projections

  1. Section 66(3)(a) of the Act requires the Committee to "as far as practicable, endeavour to ensure that, if the State or Territory were redistributed in accordance with the proposed redistribution, the number of electors enrolled in each Electoral Division in the State or Territory would not, at the projection time determined under Section 63A, be less than 96.5% or more than 103.5% of the average divisional enrolment of that State or Territory at that time".
  2. The ABS supplied enrolment projections to the AEC using AEC enrolment data as the base and a cohort-component method to project the enrolment of each Census Collector District (CCD) to 31 March 2004, that is three years and six months after the expected date of the final determination of boundaries (Table 2). Divisional Returning Officers (DROs) were asked to examine the ABS projections in the light of their local knowledge and experience, and to substitute their own projections where appropriate. DROs made use of information supplied by relevant Local Authority planning and statistical groups, as well as their own resources in undertaking this task. The Australian Electoral Officer for Western Australia also reviewed the projections, and the few changes made by DROs, to ensure a consistency of approach. The projections were available in both hardcopy and on diskette to persons or organisations interested in using them as an indication of the likely growth and as an aid to the preparation of Suggestions or Comments.
  3. The projected total enrolment for Western Australia at 31 March 2004 is 1,311,002. Thus, the average enrolment of the 15 Divisions at that time would be 87,400 and the 3.5% tolerance above and below that average required that Divisions be constructed in the range between 84,341 and 90,459 (Table 3).

Community of interests, means of communication and travel, physical features and area, and boundaries of existing Divisions

  1. The criteria set out in Section 66(3)(b) of the Act - community of interests, means of communication and travel, physical features and area, and boundaries of existing Divisions - are subordinate to the two objectives of enrolments in proposed Divisions being within a range of 3.5% above or below the average divisional enrolment at the projection time and current enrolments being within 10% above or below the quota. However, notwithstanding these overriding constraints, the Committee sought to ensure that the other criteria were given maximum possible effect, also bearing in mind that the criterion to give regard to the boundaries of existing Divisions is subordinate to the other criteria. Within the constraints imposed by the numerical criteria and the other considerations, the Committee adopted the view that it is highly desirable that electoral boundaries be readily identifiable. Accordingly, the Committee used Local Government boundaries, locality boundaries, main roads, waterways and other linear features as boundaries, wherever possible.

Suggestions and Comments

  1. When the period for the receipt of Suggestions closed on 24 March 2000, the Committee had received eleven Suggestions. Copies of these were made available for perusal at the office of the Australian Electoral Officer for Western Australia from 27 March 2000. In addition, photocopies of the Suggestions were made available to members of the public.
  2. Detailed Suggestions covering the whole of the State were received from two organisations. The remaining nine Suggestions were confined to local issues and potential names for the new Division.
  3. Clearly the provision of current and projected enrolment figures to interested parties facilitated this process as the detailed Suggestions took into account the numerical criteria.
  4. The Committee received six written Comments relating to the Suggestions by the close of the Comments period on 7 April 2000.  The Comments on Suggestions were also made available to members of the public.
  5. As required by Section 64(4) of the Act the Redistribution Committee considered all of the Suggestions and Comments lodged.

Names of proposed Divisions

  1. Naming of Federal Divisions has been the subject of a number of recommendations from Parliamentary Committees. The subject was dealt with most recently by the 1995 Inquiry of the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters. From these recommendations, there has been developed a set of guidelines or conventions that have been used by Redistribution Co